It is currently Sat May 30, 2020 5:12 am

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: What Am I Looking For?
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:22 pm 

Joined: Wed May 10, 2017 9:18 am
Posts: 10
Is there anywhere I can obtain images or information of what exactly deep space objects, such as M31, will look like using a small (130mm) telescope? I'm having difficulty finding M31 and M32, even with a go-to mount, and I suspect that it's just me not recognising what's there. I've see the usual photographs but I appreciate that astrophotography provides much more detail and colour than the eye can see, so it would help if I knew exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks in advance for any advice.

 Profile Send private message  
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:11 pm 

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:25 am
Posts: 5334
M31 is large.
You would probably be better off finding it in say a 10x50 binocular if you have one. Or any binocular. It may look like a 2 degree long ellipse, although the full extent is 5 degrees in very dark skies.
There will be no colour just a vague dim grey maybe.

Try star hoping using star maps.

At high power in a 130mm scope the whole field may be nebula.

If you only have the scope use the lowest magnification.

It helps if you have a dark sky where with average eyes it is easily seen with no optical aid.

Find M31 before bothering with M32.

It is best to learn the constellations first without optical aid.

If you have to use go-to maybe try M81 and M82 with a low power eyepiece. They are smaller.

Also M27, M57, M13 and when visible M42.
Not sure when these are visible.
Try to get them high in the sky.
With some you need higher powers.


 Profile Send private message  
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:34 pm 

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 9:58 pm
Posts: 3637
Location: Wellingborough
Hi Joop :)

Have a look at the DeepSky Watch site, especially the Astronomical Sketches section, where there are many sketches of deepsky objects made at the eyepiece. I think they were made with a larger aperture than you are using, but they are much more true to reality than the usual Hubble Images :lol:

Bear in mind though that the observing site (seeing and light pollution especially) can make a difference to the appearance of DSOs at the eyepiece,


52.3N 0.6W
Wellingborough UK.

254mm LX90 on Superwedge, WO ZS66SD, Helios 102mm f5 on EQ1, Hunter 11x80, Pentax 10x50
ASI120MC Toucam Pros 740k/840k/900nc mono, Pentax K110D
Ro-Ro roof shed

 Profile Send private message  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:44 pm 

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:16 am
Posts: 32

I understand your problem . To help me, I am building a glossary of Messier object. Here is example of M31. I have tried to make it look as though a small telescope under low mag. I probably get too much colour. I hope that helps.

David D

M31_M32_M110.jpg [ 178.23 KiB | Viewed 2949 times ]
 Profile Send private message  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:33 am 

Joined: Wed May 10, 2017 9:18 am
Posts: 10
Thanks all for your advice.

It's been most helpful and I'm now looking forward to the next clear-sky night.


 Profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group